Citation(s) from the GunPolicy.org literature library

Parker, Sarah and Katherine Green. 2012 ‘Point Allocation System.’ The Programme of Action Implementation Monitor (Phase 1): Assessing Reported Progress; Occasional Paper No. 30 (Tables 1 and 2), p. 5. Geneva: Small Arms Survey, the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva. 1 August

Relevant contents

Point Allocation System

Table 1: Point Allocation

Firm - Conditional - Encouraged Practice

Primary: 1 point - 1/2 point - 1/2 point
Subsidiary: 1/2 point - 1/4 point - 1/4 point

The total maximum available score where all commitments were included was 56.75 points. A detailed breakdown of the points available for each theme is included in Table 2.

Table 2: Available Points

Theme: Maximum Available Points

National coordination agencies: 1
National point of contact: 2
Manufacture: 3
Marking: 14.25
Record-keeping: 4
Cooperation in tracing: 1.5
International transfer: 12
Brokering: 3.5
Stockpile management: 4.5
Surplus identification and/or disposal: 4
Public awareness: 1
Other: 6

Total maximum available score: 56.75

ID: Q8754

As many publishers change their links and archive their pages, the full-text version of this article may no longer be available from the original link. In this case, please go to the publisher's web site or use a search engine.

Array
(
    [type] => 8
    [message] => Trying to get property 'websource' of non-object
    [file] => /home/gpo/public_html/components/com_gpo/helpers/citation.php
    [line] => 153
)